|
||||
|
||||
When Are Outside Directors Effective?Ran DuchinUniversity of Washington - Michael G. Foster School of Business John G. MatsusakaUniversity of Southern California - Marshall School of Business; USC Gould School of Law Oguzhan OzbasUniversity of Southern California - Marshall School of Business - Finance and Business Economics Department September 28, 2009 Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), Forthcoming USC CLEO Research Paper No. C07-13 Marshall School of Business Working Paper No. MKT 02-09 Abstract: This paper uses recent regulations that have required some companies to increase the number of outside directors on their boards to generate estimates of the effect of board independence on performance that are largely free from endogeneity problems. Our main finding is that the effectiveness of outside directors depends on the cost of acquiring information about the firm: when the cost of acquiring information is low, performance increases when outsiders are added to the board, and when the cost of information is high, performance worsens when outsiders are added to the board. The estimates provide some of the cleanest estimates to date that board independence matters, and the finding that board effectiveness depends on information cost supports a nascent theoretical literature emphasizing information asymmetry. We also find that firms compose their boards as if they understand that outsider effectiveness varies with information costs.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 61 JEL Classification: D23, G34, K22 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 26, 2008 ; Last revised: October 4, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.594 seconds