Global Antitrust Prosecutions of International Cartels: Focus on Asia
John M. Connor
Purdue University; American Antitrust Institute (AAI)
May 13, 2008
International cartelists today face antitrust investigations and possible fines in a score of national and supranational jurisdictions. This paper aims at providing quantitative information about the size and impacts of international cartel activity in Asia and uses a sample of modern private cartels to evaluate the relative effectiveness of three prominent Asian antitrust authorities. The sample consists of legal and economic information on 433 international cartels detected in Asia and the rest of the world during 1990-2007.
The need for assertive anti-cartel enforcement in Asia is demonstrated by the large affected commerce and economic injuries of known international cartels. Affected sales of detected Asian-region cartels combined with global cartels that fixed prices in Asia totals at least US$1.1 trillion in 1990-2007. The losses imposed on Asian consumers were at least $500 billion.
While more than $45 billion in penalties has been imposed world wide, it is doubtful that such monetary sanctions can deter modern international cartels. Optimal cartel deterrence is frustrated by the failure of compensatory private suits to take hold outside of North America, a reluctance to act against global cartels, and the low fines in most Asian jurisdictions. Of the three selected jurisdictions, the Korean FTC has the best record of anti-cartel enforcement in Asia, but even the KFTC's surcharges are recouping less than 15% of damages to its citizens. Without significant increases in cartel detection, in the levels of expected fines or civil penalties, or expansion of the standing of buyers to seek compensation, international price fixing will remain rational business conduct.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: international cartel, deterrence, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, antitrust
JEL Classification: L41, L44, L65, L11, L13, N60, K21, K14working papers series
Date posted: November 7, 2007 ; Last revised: April 20, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 2.406 seconds