Must Treaty Violations Be Remedied? A Critique of Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon
John Bernard Quigley
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law
Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 110
In its 2006 decision in Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to provide a requested remedy for a treaty violation on the grounds that the particular remedy was not mentioned in the treaty itself. The article criticizes this approach by the Court to remedies. In treaty law, as in domestic contract law, remedies need not be specified in the agreement. They are found in a separate body of law. The Supreme Court ignored this body of law. The article explains how remedies are provided in international law for treaty violations and suggests that the Supreme Court apply this body of law in future cases of treaty violations.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: Vienna Convention, Consular Relations, law of state responsibility, Amiable Isabella
JEL Classification: K33, K41, K42working papers series
Date posted: November 9, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds