Comparative Competition Law as a Form of Empiricism
Spencer Weber Waller
Loyola University of Chicago, School of Law - Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies
Brooklyn Journal of International Law, Vol. XXIII, No. 2, 1997
This short essay makes a plea for a comparative approach to the formulation of competition policy as an important type of empiricism. The United States is no longer alone, or even unusual, in having a robust form of competition policy. Competition law has enjoyed unparalleled growth throughout the world over the past twenty years. Virtually every western developed nation has created a sophisticated legal system capable of dealing with restrictive agreements, abuses of market power, as well as the notification and regulation of mergers and acquisitions that pose the threat of lessening competition.
The United States is out of step with the rest of the world's competition community in two important ways, At a time when the rest of the world looks to competition law for its transformative and normative potential, the United States remains locked into a narrow vision geared largely to the reflexive application of various competing microeconomic theories. While in many ways United States antitrust has reached an impasse without any visible solution, it is the rest of the world that looks to antitrust for answers to the fundamental questions about how to control economic power in their society, the role and limits of markets and economic activity in a democracy, and the political role and consequences of antitrust rules.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10
Keywords: comparative competition law, competition law, antitrust, European Union, empirical research, private rights of action
JEL Classification: D40, F13, L10, F02, K21, L40Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 9, 2007
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds