Protective Governance Choices and the Value of Acquisition Activity
Scott W. Bauguess
US Securities & Exchange Commission
September 1, 2008
Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 14, No. 5, 2008
Protective governance structure is often viewed as costly to minority shareholders who bear the costs of opportunism by entrenched managers. A less common view is that protective governance structures encourage value-enhancing initiative, allowing risk-averse managers to pursue projects they would otherwise forgo. To assess these views we examine the acquisition decisions of S&P 500 firms between 1994 and 2005 and document two entrenching dimensions of governance: founding family presence and larger boards with more inside directors. We find that family firms destroy value when they acquire, consistent with an agency cost explanation for acquisitions. In contrast, firms with large boards and more insiders are more likely to acquire and to create value when they do acquire. These results are consistent with benefits to managerial initiative when managers are insulated from discipline. Finally, we find no systematic evidence that shareholder right limiting provisions either facilitate managerial entrenchment or lead to wealth losses through acquisition activity.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 43
Keywords: Acquisitions, Governance, Family, Ownership, Shareholder Rights
JEL Classification: G32, G34Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 28, 2007 ; Last revised: November 18, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds