Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1028881
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (214)



 


 



The Morally Distinct Corporation: Reclaiming the Relational Dimension of Conscience


Robert K. Vischer


University of St. Thomas, St. Paul/Minneapolis, MN - School of Law

2007

U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-37

Abstract:     
The law has tended to deal with conscience at points of direct conflict between the individual and the state, but rights of conscience have also been invoked in a recent series of high-profile disputes between the individual and non-state associations. This trend is driven by a generally laudable commitment to minimize external interference with an individual's moral autonomy, but we must remember that the vibrancy of conscience depends in part on the vitality of the associations against which the right of conscience is currently being invoked.

Missing from our conversation about conscience is a robust articulation of its relational dimension - i.e., the notion that the dictates of conscience are defined, articulated, and lived out in relationship with others. Conscience is shaped externally; our moral convictions have sources, and our sense of self comes into relief through interaction with others. Conscience, by its very nature, directs our gaze outward, to sources of formation, to communities of discernment, and to venues for expression. When the state closes down avenues by which persons live out their core beliefs - and admittedly, some avenues must be closed if peaceful co-existence is to be possible - there is a cost to the continued vitality of conscience. It is not just a vague allegiance to moral pluralism that should underlie our legal system's reluctance to restrict the independence of the myriad associations that make up the vast space between person and state; it is a commitment to freedom of conscience. Put simply, if our society is to facilitate an authentic and robust liberty of conscience, we cannot reflexively favor individual autonomy against group authority; we must also work to cultivate the spaces in which individuals come together to live out the shared dictates of conscience.

This article is part of a bigger project outlining how the law can better support this relational dimension of conscience in a variety of areas. Here I explore the broad implications that conscience's relational dimension has for our understanding of corporations and their role in society. The exploration has three components: first, connecting liberty of conscience with the common good, explaining why institutional autonomy is an essential component of both; second, examining whether for-profit corporations may properly be considered venues for the communal expression and implementation of conscience, looking specifically at the capacity of corporations such as Wal-Mart to carve out moral identities as marketplace actors that diverge from the norms embraced by the broader society; and third, analyzing the tension between a corporation's moral identity and the exercise of conscience by dissenting community members, particularly employees.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 40

Keywords: corporations, corporate law, conscience and law, morality and law, associations, intermediary associations, corporations and morality

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 10, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Vischer, Robert K., The Morally Distinct Corporation: Reclaiming the Relational Dimension of Conscience (2007). U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-37. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1028881 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1028881

Contact Information

Robert K. Vischer (Contact Author)
University of St. Thomas, St. Paul/Minneapolis, MN - School of Law ( email )
MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States
651-962-4838 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,911
Downloads: 195
Download Rank: 93,544
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  214
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.343 seconds