SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (23)

Beta

 


 



The Quiet Devolution: How the Model Criminal Code Officers' Committee Botched New South Wales's DNA Law

Jeremy Gans
University of Melbourne



Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Vol. 14, pp. 210-223, 2002

Abstract:     
This article tracks the background to forensic procedures legislation in NSW and Australia more generally, arguing that its foundation was a subtle handover of power to an expert committee. Rather than being an occasion for the development of high quality criminal procedural legislation away from the din of criminal justice 'law and order' politics, instead, the NSW parliament (along with several other Australian legislatures) has devolved its power to a body that devised the wrong mission, had the wrong background and was subject to raw political interference untempered by even the rough and tumble of parliamentary democracy. The result is not merely inadequate criminal justice policy, but legislation so poorly drafted that it furthers no policy at all.

Keywords: DNA, forensic procedures, legislation, model crimnal code, NSW

JEL Classifications: K40

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: November 16, 2007 ; Last revised: November 16, 2007

Suggested Citation

Gans, Jeremy, The Quiet Devolution: How the Model Criminal Code Officers' Committee Botched New South Wales's DNA Law. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, Vol. 14, pp. 210-223, 2002. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030452


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Jeremy Gans (Contact Author)
University of Melbourne ( email )
Melbourne, Victoria 3010
Australia
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 206
Downloads: 17
References: 23

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds.