Citations (5)


Footnotes (286)



Technocracy and Antitrust

Daniel A. Crane

University of Michigan Law School

Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 208
Texas Law Review, Vol. 86, 2008

U.S. antitrust enforcement has declined in political salience over the past few decades even while levels of public antitrust enforcement and funding for the antitrust agencies have remained generally consistent with those of earlier periods. Antitrust has become a technocratic discipline in the minds of the political elite, delegated by Presidents and Congress to specialists in the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission.

Nonetheless, antitrust retains influential populist institutions including the civil and criminal jury, an adjudicatory system focused on binary determinations about guilt or innocence, and a Federal Trade Commission that is constrained from exercising a norm-creation role. The technocratic shift begun by the political elite could be furthered by a variety of reforms including separating cartel enforcement from other antitrust enforcement, moving from adjudication to administration, and granting the FTC norm-creation powers. Technocratic reforms are justified by three key attributes of modern antitrust - consensus on antitrust goals, resolution of the most divisive ideological questions, and the absence of a need to balance the interests of identified groups.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: antitrust, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, adjudication, rulemaking, agencies

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 17, 2007 ; Last revised: September 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Crane, Daniel A., Technocracy and Antitrust. Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 208; Texas Law Review, Vol. 86, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030632

Contact Information

Daniel A. Crane (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
734-615-2622 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,714
Downloads: 297
Download Rank: 68,074
Citations:  5
Footnotes:  286

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.390 seconds