|
||||
|
||||
State Efforts to Cap the Commons: Regulating Sources or Consumers?Dallas BurtrawResources for the Future November 1, 2007 RFF Discussion Paper No. 07-49 Abstract: California's Global Warming Solutions Act (Assembly Bill 32) requires the state to reduce aggregate greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. One of the challenges California faces is how the state should regulate the electricity sector. About 80 percent of the state's electricity consumption is generated in the state, but about 52 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with electricity consumption comes from outside the state. The question addressed in this paper is where to locate the point of compliance in the electricity sector - that is, where in the supply chain linking fuel suppliers to generators to the transmission system to retail load-serving entities should the obligation for measurement and compliance be placed. The conclusion offered is that one particular approach to regulating the electricity sector -- the "first-seller approach" -- would be best for California. The alternative "load-based approach" has a running head start in the policy process but would undermine an economywide market-based emissions trading program.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28 Keywords: electricity, climate, state level, CO2, cap and trade, market-based approaches JEL Classification: Q25, Q48, L94 working papers seriesDate posted: November 17, 2007 ; Last revised: October 20, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds