Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030921
 
 

Footnotes (4)



 


 



The South African Judicial Appointments Process


Penelope Andrews


New York Law School


Osgoode Law Journal, Vol. 44, No. 565

Abstract:     
Consideration of racial and gender diversity, and to a lesser extent disability and sexual orientation diversity, has propelled the transformation of the judiciary in South Africa. This consideration is underpinned by both the stated and unstated assumption that a majority white judiciary cannot adequately and fairly serve and deliver justice to a majority black population. The very legitimacy of the judiciary, and indeed the project of constitutional democracy, is contingent on a bench that reflects the racial and gender diversity of the society. Moreover, with equality as the primary principle in the "Bill of Rights," the judiciary has to accommodate this principle unequivocally in its appointments, processes, and jurisprudence.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Keywords: Judiciary, constitutionalism, race, women

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K40


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 26, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Andrews, Penelope, The South African Judicial Appointments Process. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1030921

Contact Information

Penelope Andrews (Contact Author)
New York Law School ( email )
185 West Broadway
New York, NY 10013
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,673
Downloads: 223
Download Rank: 88,571
Footnotes:  4

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds