Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1031153
 
 

Footnotes (335)



 


 



Constitutional Evidence Law


Alex Stein


Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law


Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, 2008
Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 207

Abstract:     
This Article identifies the causes and consequences of a puzzling asymmetry in constitutional law. Of the three facets of adjudicative fact-finding - evidence, procedure, and rules of decision - only two are constitutionalized. Constitutional law regulates procedural and decisional rules - not whether the evidence that fact-finders use is adequate. Allocation of the risk of error by procedures and decisional rules - formulated as burdens of proof - is subject to constitutional scrutiny. Allocation of the risk of error by the rules of evidential adequacy, however, is free from that scrutiny. This constitutional asymmetry is puzzling because all risk-allocation impacts court decisions and, consequently, whether a person is deprived erroneously of her liberty or property. This Article explains this asymmetry in the informal constitutionalization of evidence - a phenomenon that implicates three dynamics of power and culture. First, state evidence rules generally align with the Supreme Court's agenda for risk-allocation. Second, when those rules do deviate from the Court's agenda to promote local interests, they do not do so overtly. Finally, a state rule's alignment with a federal rule of evidence guarantees its constitutionality. This informal order reflects a series of implicit, but credible understandings between state courts and the Supreme Court. This Article identifies and illustrates these understandings.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 62

Keywords: evidence, constitution, due process, trials, burden of proof, risk of error

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2007 ; Last revised: September 28, 2011

Suggested Citation

Stein, Alex, Constitutional Evidence Law. Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 61, 2008; Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 207. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1031153

Contact Information

Alex Stein (Contact Author)
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )
55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,244
Downloads: 245
Download Rank: 68,338
Footnotes:  335

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.282 seconds