Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1033165
 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



The Trademark Use Requirement in Dilution Cases


Stacey L. Dogan


Boston University - School of Law

Mark A. Lemley


Stanford Law School

February 2, 2011

Santa Clara Comp. & High Tech. Law Journal, Vol. 24, p. 541, 2008
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1033165

Abstract:     
The trademark use doctrine plays a critical role in ensuring that trademark law serves its proper purpose of encouraging market exchange and lowering consumer search costs. As we have explained in detail elsewhere, the doctrine ensures that trademarks do not become a weapon used to suppress speech or to interfere with rather than promote the efficient operation of the marketplace.

Those goals are even more important in the context of trademark dilution. Unlike a normal cause of action for trademark infringement, trademark dilution gives broader rights to a few famous mark owners to prevent even non-confusing uses in order to protect the uniqueness of their marks against blurring and tarnishment. But because trademark dilution can exist even when goods do not compete, and even absent any likelihood of confusion, it is even more critical that the universe of actions that can give rise to dilution be cabined by a clear and effective trademark use doctrine.

The Lanham Act has had a trademark use limitation on dilution since the first dilution legislation was enacted in 1996, but recent amendments have changed the language and scope of that limitation, leading to some confusion about what is and is not protected. In this article, we parse the language and legislative history of the 2006 Trademark Dilution Revision Act and explain why the trademark use requirement in the new statute not only survives but is more robust than before.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 2, 2007 ; Last revised: February 6, 2011

Suggested Citation

Dogan, Stacey L. and Lemley, Mark A., The Trademark Use Requirement in Dilution Cases (February 2, 2011). Santa Clara Comp. & High Tech. Law Journal, Vol. 24, p. 541, 2008; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1033165. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1033165

Contact Information

Stacey L. Dogan
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,835
Downloads: 394
Download Rank: 41,825
Footnotes:  80
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. What the Right of Publicity Can Learn from Trademark Law
By Stacey Dogan and Mark Lemley

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.328 seconds