Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1041421
 


 



Evidence and Ethics: Litigating in the Shadows of the Rules


Joseph A. Colquitt


University of Alabama - School of Law


U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1041421
Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, 2007

Abstract:     
Obviously, it is virtually inconceivable that we could identify and catalog all of the possible scenarios that will face attorneys as they litigate cases. Litigation routinely creates situations that require counsel to make difficult choices. No list of possibilities or set of rules would ever be truly complete or particularly helpful.

This article introduces, then analyzes, two scenarios to examine the customary conduct of attorneys and judges during criminal litigation. The scenarios seek to place the attorney in each scenario in a realistic predicament in which unresolved ethical questions remain after application of all evidence and ethics rules. The applicable rules are identified, analyzed, and applied within the scenarios to discuss the role of lawyers in the litigation setting. Additionally, the analysis addresses three schools of thought in professional ethics: namely, zealous advocacy, personal conscience, and professional conscience.

The first scenario is drawn from an actual homicide prosecution in which the prosecution's evidence addresses motive. Scenario 2 is built from several rape cases. The scenario examines previous false claim evidence in a rape case. In this scenario, the evidence is defense-proffered. The proffered evidence in each scenario introduces the potential for prejudice. The evidence also provides an opportunity to examine rules of evidence and ethics and how they protect or fail to protect against prejudice

The piece notes the difficulty of identifying beforehand the countless situations attorneys may face during litigation and the difficulty of drafting rules sufficiently detailed to be useful to attorneys and judges during trials, yet general enough to apply to the broad range of circumstances likely to be confronted. Nevertheless, some possibilities for strengthening the guidance to counsel during litigation are suggested.

Keywords: attorney, character, criminal, defense, ethics, evidence, false claim, homicide, judge, litigation, motive, personal conscience, prejudice, professional conscience, propensity, prosecution, rape, rule, zealous advocacy

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: December 5, 2007 ; Last revised: March 11, 2008

Suggested Citation

Colquitt, Joseph A., Evidence and Ethics: Litigating in the Shadows of the Rules. U of Alabama Public Law Research Paper No. 1041421; Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1041421

Contact Information

Joseph A. Colquitt (Contact Author)
University of Alabama - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 870382
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487
United States
205-348-1145 (Phone)
205-348-5829 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 475

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.234 seconds