The Market Reaction to Cross-Listings: Does the Destination Market Matter?
Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University; Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM)
Mathijs A. Van Dijk
Erasmus University - Rotterdam School of Management; Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM)
April 14, 2009
Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 33, pp. 1898-1908, 2009
This paper examines (i) whether market reactions to cross-listings differ across destination markets and (ii) to what extent the following explanations for value creation around cross-listings can account for differences in market reactions across cross-listings on various destination markets: overcoming market segmentation, increased market liquidity, improved information disclosure, and better investor protection (“bonding”). We analyze 526 cross-listings from 44 different countries on 8 major stock exchanges and document significant announcement returns of 1.3% on average for cross-listings on U.S. exchanges, 1.1% on London Stock Exchange, 0.6% on exchanges in continental Europe, and 0.5% (not significant) on Tokyo Stock Exchange. We find evidence consistent with improved disclosure and bonding creating value for cross-listings on U.S. exchanges, while overcoming segmentation and bonding are associated with higher announcement returns on the London Stock Exchange. The evidence is mixed for continental European exchanges and for Tokyo. Our results highlight the role of the destination market in value creation around cross-listings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31
Keywords: Cross-listings, Capital market integration, Investor protection, Market liquidity, Information disclosure
JEL Classification: F30, G14, G15Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 3, 2007 ; Last revised: May 1, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds