|
||||
|
||||
Did the Corporate Criminal Sentencing Guidelines Matter? Some Preliminary Empirical ObservationsJeffrey S. ParkerGeorge Mason University School of Law Raymond A. AtkinsCovington & Burling Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Part 2), pp. 423-453, April 1999 George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 07-47 Abstract: This paper presents an empirical analysis of the Federal Sentencing Commission's 1991 guidelines for imposing criminal sentences on corporations convicted of federal crimes. Despite the Sentencing Commission's announced intentions of raising and restructuring corporate fines, we generally find no statistically significant change in the level or structure of corporate monetary penalties imposed under the guidelines during 1992-95, as compared with baseline data taken from preguideline cases sentenced in 1988, after controlling for the harm attributed to the criminal offense. In an extension of that analysis, we find a marginally significant change in the relationship between corporate penalty levels and the presence of individual codefendants charged together with the corporation in the direction of attenuating that relationship in the postguidelines era. We discuss the implications of these findings from the perspective of the limited role played by corporate criminal sentencing determinations in the overall public law enforcement effort.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33 Keywords: Federal Sentencing Commission, sentencing guidelines, criminal law, corporate crime, penalty levels JEL Classification: K14, M14 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 6, 2007Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.312 seconds