Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1065952
 
 

References (24)



 


 



Religion is Not a Preference


Joshua Mitchell


Harvard University - Department of Economics


Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, Issue 2, pp. 351-362, May 2007

Abstract:     
The resurgence of religion around the globe poses a challenge for both empirical and normative social scientists. For the former, the question is whether the terms at their disposal are adequate to comprehend religious self-understanding and, therefore, human motivation and conduct. For the latter, the question is whether those terms confuse or clarify the way in which religion may be brought into public dialog without violating the tenets of pluralism or toleration. How, then, do social scientists of both persuasions currently understand religion? I begin by distinguishing religious experience from other sorts of experience, with a view to demonstrating, first, that the two preeminent terms adopted by social scientists today preference and choice cannot comprehend religious experience. To do this, I provide a brief exposition of what I call the fable of liberalism, in order to explain why the terms preference and choice have achieved the currency that they have and what problems their invocation was intended to address. Second, I consider two other terms social scientists often invoke value and identity and suggest that these terms also are inadequate for understanding religious experience. The first set of terms arises in the eighteenth century, out of the Anglo-American tradition; the second set of terms arises in the nineteenth century, out of the German tradition. None of these terms are able to comprehend religious experience, which antedates these sets of terms by centuries. I end by suggesting, first, that empirical social scientists would do well to reconsider whether terms that arose during specific historical moments in order to circumvent or to supersede religious experience can help them understand human motivation, let alone predict human conduct, whenever or wherever religion is involved; and, second, that the attempt by well-meaning normative social scientists to bring religion into the public sphere by treating it in terms of preference, choice, value, or identity distorts religious experience, and cannot succeed as a strategy for reintroducing religion into public dialog, since religion is not what they wish to render it in terms of.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 12

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: December 11, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Mitchell, Joshua, Religion is Not a Preference. Journal of Politics, Vol. 69, Issue 2, pp. 351-362, May 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1065952 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00536.x

Contact Information

Joshua Mitchell (Contact Author)
Harvard University - Department of Economics ( email )
Littauer Center
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 924
Downloads: 11
References:  24

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds