|
||||
|
||||
Are Aggressive Reporting Practices Indicative of Risk-Taking Corporate Environments?Mary Margaret FrankUniversity of Virginia - Darden School of Business Luann J. LynchUniversity of Virginia - Darden School of Business Sonja O. RegoIndiana University - Kelley School of Business Rong ZhaoUniversity of Calgary March 31, 2012 Abstract: We examine whether firms with aggressive financial and tax reporting also have greater risk-taking corporate environments. We use investing, financing and operating policies and measures of firm risk to assess a firm’s risk-taking environment. We separate our analyses into the periods before and after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) because prior evidence suggests SOX affected reporting and risk-taking practices. Our results provide strong evidence that before SOX, firms with greater risk-taking environments also engaged in more aggressive reporting. Our results also suggest that SOX eliminated the positive association between corporate risk-taking environments and aggressive reporting. Results from shareholder valuation tests indicate that in the pre-SOX time period, shareholders valued aggressive reporting – but not corporate risk-taking – at a premium. However, the passage of SOX substantially altered how shareholders assess aggressive reporting and corporate risk-taking.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 53 Keywords: Corporate risk taking, corporate culture, aggressive reporting, tax avoidance, earnings management JEL Classification: M41, M43, M49, H25, G30, J33, G12 working papers seriesDate posted: December 9, 2007 ; Last revised: January 8, 2013Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.500 seconds