Damages Caps in Medical Malpractice Cases
Leonard J. Nelson III
Samford University - Cumberland School of Law
Michael A. Morrisey
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Meredith L. Kilgore
University of Alabama at Birmingham - School of Public Health
Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 85, No. 2, pp. 259-286, June 2007
This article reviews the empirical literature on the effects of damages caps and concludes that the better-designed studies show that damages caps reduce liability insurance premiums. The effects of damages caps on defensive medicine, physicians location decisions, and the cost of health care to consumers are less clear. The only study of whether consumers benefit from lower health insurance premiums as a result of damages caps found no impact. Some state courts have based decisions declaring damages caps legislation unconstitutional on the lack of evidence of their effectiveness, thereby ignoring the findings of conflicting research studies or discounting their relevance. Although courts should be cautious in rejecting empirical evidence that caps are effective, legislators should consider whether they benefit consumers enough to justify limiting tort recoveries for those most seriously injured by malpractice.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 11, 2007
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds