Fundamental Fairness in Union Regulation of Sports Agents
Richard T. Karcher
Florida Coastal School of Law
Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2007
This Article addresses whether the agent regulations unilaterally adopted by the players associations in the four professional sports leagues afford agents a sufficiently fair enforcement process. This issue involves a complicated interplay of multiple bodies of law that govern the competing interests of unions and agents. On the one hand, the union is the exclusive representative of the players under the National Labor Relations Act and, as a private association, the law affords the union great deference to interpret and enforce its own regulations. On the other hand, when the union accuses an agent of misconduct and seeks to take away the agent's livelihood by suspending or revoking the agent's license, the agent is entitled to a fundamentally fair enforcement and adjudication procedure, one that comports with basic notions of due process and affords the level of fairness contemplated by the Federal Arbitration Act. This Article addresses the proper balance of these competing interests throughout the various stages of the agent regulation process.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: arbitration, dispute resolution, labor, unionAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 10, 2007 ; Last revised: May 3, 2009
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.593 seconds