Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1071187
 
 

Footnotes (162)



 


 



Commercial Speech, First Amendment Intuitionism and the Twilight Zone of Viewpoint Discrimination


Martin H. Redish


Northwestern University - School of Law


Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 41
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 08-20

Abstract:     
In this article, I seek to demonstrate that arguments made by scholars against First Amendment protection for commercial speech may be divided into three categories: (1) rationalist, (2) intuitionist, and (3) ideological. I argue that all three forms of opposition to commercial speech protection suffer, either directly or indirectly, from the same fundamental flaw: each constitutes or at the very least facilitates creation of a constitutionally destructive form of viewpoint discrimination. I show that all of the specific rationales for opposing First Amendment protection for commercial speech are fatally and illogically underinclusive: In each case the justification asserted to support reduced protection for commercial speech logically applies with equal force to one or more categories of fully protected non-commercial expression, yet those advocating reduced protection for commercial speech readily provide full protection to the categories of non-commercial expression that suffer from the very same defect. Thus, what superficially appears to constitute a plausible and principled rationale for reducing protection for commercial speech in reality is applied¿irrationally and unjustifiably¿to commercial but not to various forms of fully protected speech. Such irrational underinclusion represents a classic form of sub rosa viewpoint discrimination. In this case, the viewpoint being discriminated against, while not embodied directly in the commercial speech itself, is a belief in a capitalist system of which all commercial speech is a part. Ironically, then, speech which some say should be denied protection because it fails to deal with the political process, in reality is likely excluded from the First Amendment's scope by many for what amount to foundational ideological concerns.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 141

Keywords: first amendment, commercial speech, speech, viewpoint discrimination, expression

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K30, K39, K40, K49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 14, 2007 ; Last revised: May 27, 2008

Suggested Citation

Redish, Martin H., Commercial Speech, First Amendment Intuitionism and the Twilight Zone of Viewpoint Discrimination. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 41; Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 08-20. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1071187

Contact Information

Martin H. Redish (Contact Author)
Northwestern University - School of Law ( email )
375 E. Chicago Ave
Unit 1505
Chicago, IL 60611
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 979
Downloads: 149
Download Rank: 110,670
Footnotes:  162

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.297 seconds