Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1071196
 
 

References (1)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The 'Tobacco Wars': Global Litigation Strategies


Lawrence O. Gostin


Georgetown University - Law Center - O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law


JAMA, Vol. 298, pp. 2537-2539, 2007
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1071196

Abstract:     
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) identifies civil and criminal litigation as a public health strategy and promotes international cooperation (reporting, technical assistance, and information exchange). Holding the tobacco industry accountable through civil and criminal liability serves a number of public health objectives: punishes companies for hiding known health risks, manipulating nicotine content, and misleading the public; deters and preve nts future harmful behavior; compensates individuals and stake-holders for health care and other costs associated with smoking and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS); raises prices, resulting in lower tobacco consumption; increases disclosure of health risks, through labeling and advertising restrictions; and promotes transparency, by compelling discovery of internal industry documents.

Tobacco litigation frequently has been used as a method for promoting tobacco control in the United States. Litigation is less common outside the United States, but increasingly advocates have brought innovative lawsuits abroad. This commentary explores global tobacco litigation strategies, with 4 key elements: compensation/recovery, advertising restrictions, criminal liability, and public interest writ litigation.

The commentary argues that perhaps the most important effect of tobacco litigation has been to transform public and political perceptions about risk and responsibility in smoking, making clear what manufacturers knew, how they concealed this knowledge, and how they manipulated consumers. Tort law has reframed the debate from personal to corporate responsibility. However, the industry still manages, at least in the political realm, to alter the discourse to one involving freedom of choice for the smoker, the evils of big government, unfair taxation, and the influence of trial lawyers.

Furthermore, now that the tobacco industry is aggressively seeking new markets in the poorest, least-regulated countries, litigation will take on new importance. The most promising strategies will use a human rights framework, arguing that tobacco is so detrimental that it violates the rights to health, life, and a sanitary environment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, Public Health, Global Health

JEL Classification: K00, K23, K32, I10, I18

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 14, 2007 ; Last revised: December 15, 2010

Suggested Citation

Gostin, Lawrence O., The 'Tobacco Wars': Global Litigation Strategies. JAMA, Vol. 298, pp. 2537-2539, 2007; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 1071196. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1071196

Contact Information

Lawrence O. Gostin (Contact Author)
Georgetown University - Law Center - O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
202-662-9038 (Phone)
202-662-9055 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 699
Downloads: 49
References:  1
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.282 seconds