Abstract

 
 

References (37)



 
 

Citations (8)



 


 



Ownership, Control and Market Liquidity


Edith Ginglinger


Université Paris-Dauphine

Jacques Hamon


Université Paris Dauphine - CEREG

June 1, 2007

Paris December 2007 Finance International Meeting AFFI-EUROFIDAI Paper

Abstract:     
We examine how ownership concentration and the separation of ownership and control affect secondary-market liquidity in France. We find that firms with a large insider blockholder exhibit significantly lower liquidity. However, different methods of enhancing control affect liquidity in different ways. Pyramid structures impair market liquidity. Double voting right shares, a French specific means of control enhancement rewarding long-term shareholders and restraining insiders from trading their shares, lead to increased liquidity, especially for family firms. Our results suggest that by using double voting rights to enhance their control, a transparent decoupling mechanism, rather than pyramids, an opaque decoupling mechanism, blockholders offer higher secondary-market liquidity to outside investors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: ownership, blockholders, long-term shareholders, ultimate control, pyramids, voting rights, liquidity, bid-ask spread

JEL Classification: G32, G34, G14

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2007 ; Last revised: March 17, 2011

Suggested Citation

Ginglinger, Edith and Hamon, Jacques, Ownership, Control and Market Liquidity (June 1, 2007). Paris December 2007 Finance International Meeting AFFI-EUROFIDAI Paper. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1071624 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1071624

Contact Information

Edith Ginglinger (Contact Author)
Université Paris-Dauphine ( email )
Place du Marechal de Lattre Tassigny
Paris, 75775
France
Jacques Hamon
Université Paris Dauphine - CEREG ( email )
Place du Marechal de Lattre Tassigny
Paris
France
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,581
Downloads: 440
Download Rank: 23,514
References:  37
Citations:  8

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.359 seconds