Paying for Particulars in People-to-Be
University of San Diego: School of Law
February 12, 2012
34 J. MED. ETHICS 162 (2008)
The push of biomedical profits and pull of consumer desire for happier and more successful children heralds a robust market in offspring enhancement. There are two reasons that we might worry about the reach of commerce into the realm of selective reproduction. The first is that for-profit genetic enhancement, under conditions of economic necessity, would exploit the poor by coercing them, in effect, to part with reproductive material. The second concern is that buying and selling sperm, eggs, and embryos would distort the meaning, and degrade the worth, of those entities and the reproductive practices that enlist them. This Article evaluates these exploitation and corruption concerns. I use analogies to more familiar markets in markets in blood, tissues, and organs, I outline the conditions under which distinct strands of each concern provide weak or strong reasons to resist a market in offspring with specified characteristics. I sketch policy recommendations that draw on tax, patent, and contract mechanisms to regulate commercial means of genetic control.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 7
Keywords: genetic enhancement, commercialization, commodification, commensurability
JEL Classification: M30, O14, O33Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 17, 2007 ; Last revised: August 3, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.625 seconds