Abstract

 
 

References (32)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



Investment Volatility: A Critique of Standard Beta Estimation and a Simple Way Forward


Chris Tofallis


University of Hertfordshire Business School


European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 187, pp. 1358-1367, 2008
U of Hertfordshire Business School Working Paper No. 2004:3

Abstract:     
Beta is a widely used quantity in investment analysis. We review the common interpretations that are applied to beta in finance and show that the standard method of estimation - least squares regression - is inconsistent with these interpretations.

We present the case for an alternative beta estimator which is more appropriate, as well as being easier to understand and to calculate. Unlike regression, the line fit we propose treats both variables in the same way. Remarkably, it provides a slope that is precisely the ratio of the volatility of the investment's rate of return to the volatility of the market index rate of return (or the equivalent excess rates of returns). Hence, this line fitting method gives an alternative beta, which corresponds exactly to the relative volatility of an investment - which is one of the usual interpretations attached to beta.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 16

Keywords: investment analysis, beta, volatility, systematic risk.

JEL Classification: G10, D81

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 3, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Tofallis, Chris, Investment Volatility: A Critique of Standard Beta Estimation and a Simple Way Forward. U of Hertfordshire Business School Working Paper No. 2004:3; U of Hertfordshire Business School Working Paper No. 2004:3. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1076742

Contact Information

Chris Tofallis (Contact Author)
University of Hertfordshire Business School ( email )
College Lane
Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB
United Kingdom
HOME PAGE: http://tinyurl.com/tofallis
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 10,699
Downloads: 3,002
Download Rank: 1,358
References:  32
Citations:  2

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.438 seconds