Are Judges Overpaid?: A Skeptical Response to the Judicial Salary Debate
Stephen J. Choi
New York University School of Law
G. Mitu Gulati
Duke University - School of Law
Eric A. Posner
University of Chicago - Law School
U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 376
Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 178
Nearly everyone thinks that judges are underpaid, but theory and evidence provide little support for this view. Theory suggests that increasing judicial salaries will improve judicial performance only if judges can be sanctioned for performing inadequately or if the appointments process reliably screens out low-ability candidates. However, federal judges and many state judges cannot be sanctioned, and the reliability of screening processes is open to question. An empirical study of the high court judges of the 50 states provides little evidence that raising salaries would improve judicial performance. The case for a pay raise has not been made.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 74working papers series
Date posted: December 21, 2007 ; Last revised: March 19, 2009
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds