|
||||
|
||||
Are Judges Overpaid?: A Skeptical Response to the Judicial Salary DebateStephen J. ChoiNew York University School of Law G. Mitu GulatiDuke University - School of Law Eric A. PosnerUniversity of Chicago - Law School December 2007 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 376 Duke Law School Legal Studies Paper No. 178 Abstract: Nearly everyone thinks that judges are underpaid, but theory and evidence provide little support for this view. Theory suggests that increasing judicial salaries will improve judicial performance only if judges can be sanctioned for performing inadequately or if the appointments process reliably screens out low-ability candidates. However, federal judges and many state judges cannot be sanctioned, and the reliability of screening processes is open to question. An empirical study of the high court judges of the 50 states provides little evidence that raising salaries would improve judicial performance. The case for a pay raise has not been made.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 74 working papers seriesDate posted: December 21, 2007 ; Last revised: March 19, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.375 seconds