Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1078010
 


 



Reconceiving Reparations: Multiple Strategies in the Reparations Debate


Eric J. Miller


Loyola Law School Los Angeles


Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol. 4, No. 24, 2004

Abstract:     
Much of the current debate over African-American reparations is characterized by a posture of confrontation and demand, and is exemplified in the law by seeking redress using the doctrines of tort and unjust enrichment. This confrontational posture presents a variety of legal, political, and ethical problems for reparations advocates, and has alienated potential allies from the reparations movement. This Article examines and exposes the confrontation model's shortcomings, proposing as an alternative a "conversational" model for reparations debate and advocacy. The conversational framework is not only a superior litigation strategy that more closely approximates traditional civil rights litigation, it also embraces the complexity of the current debate on race, premitting the nation to engage in a more inclusive discussion of the future of race in America.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: reparations, civil rights

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 24, 2007  

Suggested Citation

Miller, Eric J., Reconceiving Reparations: Multiple Strategies in the Reparations Debate. Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol. 4, No. 24, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1078010

Contact Information

Eric J. Miller (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-1175 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.lls.edu/aboutus/facultyadministration/faculty/facultylistl-r/millereric/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 378
Downloads: 47

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.329 seconds