Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1078302
 
 

Footnotes (201)



 


 



Executive Exclusion and the Cloistering of the Cheney Energy Task Force


Eric Dannenmaier


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law


NYU Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 16, p. 329, 2008

Abstract:     
This paper asks whether the exclusion of environmentalists by the Cheney Energy Task Force can be understood in First Amendment terms as a form of belief-based discrimination. The Task Force operated secretively in the early weeks of the administration; counseled by industry but cloistered from those who would challenge the administration's production-based orthodoxy. Records released six years after the Task Force disbanded show it met with environmental groups just once - late in its tenure after priorities were established - though it met early and often with industry representatives. Privileging the ideologically compatible is a Washington tradition and (in some circumstances) an executive branch prerogative which the author describes as "executive exclusion." Yet here the exclusion of environmentalists seemed motivated by more than mere policy differences; the record suggests they were shut out because of their identity and not just ideas. The article explores that animus to ask how it should be seen within the framework of First Amendment protection for viewpoint and belief. The author finds the phenomenon does not fit neatly into a free speech analysis because the Cheney process was not a sufficiently public forum; nor a free exercise or establishment analysis because the beliefs and identity at issue cannot be understood as sufficiently analogous to religion to advance an establishment claim. Yet the Cheney Task Force raises concerns about political exclusion and identity-based discrimination inconsistent with core democratic principles. While the phenomenon appears at the edge of traditional First Amendment protection, the author concludes that it warrants further scrutiny and asks whether Congressional action to tighten the principal federal law on executive processes openness - the Federal Advisory Committee Act - offers a potential solution.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Executive Privilege, Environmental Law, Energy Policy, First Amendment, Establishment, Free Exercise, Deliberative Democracy, Administrative Process

JEL Classification: K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 24, 2007 ; Last revised: February 11, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dannenmaier, Eric, Executive Exclusion and the Cloistering of the Cheney Energy Task Force. NYU Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 16, p. 329, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1078302

Contact Information

Eric Dannenmaier (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States
HOME PAGE: http://indylaw.indiana.edu/people/profile.cfm?Id=287

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 532
Downloads: 102
Download Rank: 154,205
Footnotes:  201

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.266 seconds