Citations (5)


Footnotes (172)



The Next Frontier for Network Neutrality

Phil Weiser

University of Colorado Law School

Administrative Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2008
U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Working Paper No. 08-05

The challenge for policymakers evaluating calls to institute some form of network neutrality regulation is to bring reasoned analysis to bear on a topic that continues to generate more heat than light and that many telecommunications companies appear to believe will just fade away. Over the fall of 2007, the hopes of broadband providers that broadband networks could escape any form of regulatory oversight were dealt a blow when it was revealed that Comcast had degraded the experience of some users of Bittorent (a peer-to-peer application) and engaged in an undisclosed form of network management. This incident, as well as the polarized debate that followed it, underscores the need to reframe the policy and academic debate over broadband regulation and begin evaluating a blueprint for a next generation regulatory strategy that will focus on promoting innovation in the network itself and by applications developers. This Article seeks to do just that.

This Article begins by explaining how the debate over network neutrality has all-too-often presented polarized perspectives and slogans where more nuanced analysis is called for. As Internet pioneer David Clark commented on the network neutrality debate, [m]ost of what we have seen so far (in my opinion) either greatly overreaches, or is so vague as to be nothing but a lawyer's employment act. As the Article explains, any effort by Congress to develop a well-specified response to network neutrality concerns would be premature, as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) should first be afforded an opportunity to develop an effective consumer protection and competition policy strategy.

As the Article explains, the FTC has an important opportunity - and indeed a responsibility - to develop and implement a consumer protection strategy in this area, calling for effective disclosure of broadband terms of service and the enforcement of the commitments made in those policies. Moreover, as to the relevant competition policy issues, the Article calls on either the FTC or the FCC (or both) to develop and implement an effective institutional strategy to guard against anticompetitive refusals to provide access to quality of service assurances. In short, the appropriate response to network neutrality concerns is not to ban such quality of service assurances altogether - as that would stifle the Internet's development - but to ensure that the offering of such assurances is not used to injure competition and harm consumers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: network neutrality, Internet policy, broadband

JEL Classification: K21, K23, L96, 033

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 6, 2008 ; Last revised: December 23, 2013

Suggested Citation

Weiser, Phil, The Next Frontier for Network Neutrality. Administrative Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2008; U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Working Paper No. 08-05. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1080672

Contact Information

Phil Weiser (Contact Author)
University of Colorado Law School ( email )
401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,588
Downloads: 773
Download Rank: 20,491
Citations:  5
Footnotes:  172

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.235 seconds