References (10)



Virtue Ethics and Repugnant Conclusions

Matt Zwolinski

University of San Diego

David Schmidtz


ENVIRONMENTAL VIRTUE ETHICS, Philip Cafaro and Ronald Sandler, eds., Rowman and Littlefield, 2004

Both utilitarian and deontological moral theories locate the source of our moral beliefs in the wrong sorts of considerations. One way this failure manifests itself, we argue, is in the ways these theories analyze the proper human relationship toward the non-human environment. Another, more notorious, manifestation of this failure is found in Derek Parfit's Repugnant Conclusion. Our goal is to explore the connection between these two failures, and to suggest that they are failures of act-centered moral theories in general. As such, they cannot be fixed by simply developing a better version of such a theory. Virtue-based theories, we suggest, provide a more promising alternative.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Environmental Ethics, Environmentalism, Thomas Hill, Derek Parfit, Utilitarianism, Deontology, Repugnant Conclusion, Virtue Ethics, Virtue Theory

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 6, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Zwolinski, Matt and Schmidtz, David, Virtue Ethics and Repugnant Conclusions. ENVIRONMENTAL VIRTUE ETHICS, Philip Cafaro and Ronald Sandler, eds., Rowman and Littlefield, 2004. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1080703

Contact Information

Matt Zwolinski
University of San Diego ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
619-260-4094 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.sandiego.edu/~mzwolinski
David Schmidtz (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,762
Downloads: 276
Download Rank: 81,922
References:  10

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds