|
||||
|
||||
Information Disclosure and Corporate GovernanceBenjamin E. HermalinUniversity of California, Berkeley Michael S. WeisbachOhio State University (OSU) - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) January 30, 2011 Fisher College of Business Working Paper No. 2008-03-016 Journal of Finance, Forthcoming Charles A. Dice Center Working Paper No. 2008-17 Abstract: In public-policy discussions about corporate disclosure, more is typically judged better than less. In particular, better disclosure is seen as a way to reduce the agency problems that plague firms. We show that this view is incomplete. In particular, our theoretical analysis shows that increased disclosure is a two-edged sword: More information permits principals to make better decisions; but it can, itself, generate additional agency problems and other costs for shareholders, including increased executive compensation. Consequently, there can exist a point beyond which additional disclosure decreases firm value. We further show that larger firms will tend to adopt stricter disclosure rules than smaller firms, ceteris paribus. Firms with better disclosure will tend, all else equal, to employ more able management. We show that governance reforms that have imposed greater disclosure could, in part, explain recent increases in both ceo compensation and ceo turnover rates.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 47 Keywords: Corporate Governance, Corporate Disclosure JEL Classification: G30, L20, D82, D83, M42 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 10, 2008 ; Last revised: February 2, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 1.078 seconds