Earnings Aspirations and Job Satisfaction: The Affective and Cognitive Impact of Earnings Comparisons
University of Aberdeen - Business School
Georgios A. Panos
University of Stirling - Economics Division - Stirling Management School
University of Aberdeen Business School Working Paper No. 2007-01
Theories of interdependent preferences predicts that the effect of peer earnings on individual well-being is either negative, the relative deprivation, or positive the cognitive effect. The evidence so far has attributed the dominance of each of the above effects on the country's economic and political environment. This study claims that relative earnings can affect job satisfaction in two opposite ways, through the affective, relative deprivation, and the cognitive channel. The dominance of each effect depends on the individual-specific financial situation rather than the country's environment. Utilising a longitudinal dataset for British employees, the results of this study show that the cognitive informational effect of peer earnings dominates social comparisons for those in financial distress. It further suggests job satisfaction is a relative concept.
Keywords: Earnings, Job Satisfaction, Financial Vulnerability, Reference Group
JEL Classification: C23, C25, D64, D84, J28working papers series
Date posted: January 11, 2008
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.813 seconds