Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1083816
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (320)



 


 



No Boy Left Behind? Single-Sex Education and the Essentialist Myth of Masculinity


David S. Cohen


Drexel University School of Law

February 12, 2008

Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 84, p. 135, 2009
Drexel College of Law Research Paper No. 2008-A-02

Abstract:     
In late 2006, the Department of Education changed the Title IX regulations to broaden the permissibility of single-sex education in primary and secondary schools. The changes took place in the context of a growing concern over the performance and well-being of boys in American schools. This article describes, dissects, and critically analyzes the narrative about boys, masculinity, and single-sex education that surrounded these changes.

The public narrative about the need for single-sex education focused, in substantial part, on what I call the essentialist myth of masculinity. This article catalogs the important components of this myth: heteronormativity, aggression, activity, sports-obsession, competitiveness, stoicism, and not being girls. The article then shows, using education and gender theory, that this conception of masculinity is harmful to both girls and boys. Instead of pushing this form of masculinity, the law and schools should make room for multiple and varied masculinities for boys (and girls).

The article argues that the Title IX regulatory change that allows for the expansion of single-sex schooling can actually work to further empower and entrench the essentialist myth of masculinity, thus violating its own prohibition on sex stereotyping. By adopting strong interpretations of already-existing jurisprudence about gender stereotyping from both constitutional law and Title IX, the article shows how de-essentializing masculinity is possible and preferable in the law. The article concludes that schools that implement single-sex education must do so for reasons other than promoting an essentialized notion of masculinity and that the law must be vigilant in ensuring that schools' implementation not further reify dominant conceptions of what it means to be a boy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 74

Keywords: single-sex education, Title IX, masculinity, gender, essentialism, sex discrimination, Equal Protection

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2008 ; Last revised: August 13, 2009

Suggested Citation

Cohen, David S., No Boy Left Behind? Single-Sex Education and the Essentialist Myth of Masculinity (February 12, 2008). Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 84, p. 135, 2009; Drexel College of Law Research Paper No. 2008-A-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1083816

Contact Information

David S. Cohen (Contact Author)
Drexel University School of Law ( email )
3320 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
215-571-4714 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,170
Downloads: 444
Download Rank: 35,393
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  320

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.375 seconds