|
||||
|
||||
Prosecutors, Ethics, and Expert WitnessesPaul C. GiannelliCase Western Reserve University School of Law Kevin C. McMunigalCase Western Reserve University School of Law Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-04 Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, 2007 Abstract: Commentators who have examined the DNA exonerations have noted the disturbing role that prosecutors have played in these wrongful convictions. Another significant contributor to these miscarriages of justice is the misuse of expert testimony, a third of the cases according to some sources. This Article examines the intersection of these two factors - the prosecutor's role in using and presenting expert testimony. Prosecutorial misconduct may occur during most stages of a trial, beginning with the selection of witnesses, including the improper "shopping" for experts. Additional abuses occur when prosecutors fail to abide by rules governing the pretrial disclosure of scientific evidence - for example, late disclosure, omitting information from laboratory reports, declining to have a report prepared, and failing to disclose exculpatory evidence. Finally, there are numerous ways to present expert testimony in a misleading manner.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46 Keywords: Erroneous convictions, prosecutors, ethics, expert witnesses, prosecutorial misbehavior, tainted or fraudulent science, laboratory report omissions, delayed disclosure, "shopping" for an expert JEL Classification: K10, K14 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 23, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds