Can Theories of Meaning and Reference Solve the Problem of Legal Determinacy?
University of Minnesota Law School
Ratio Juris, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 281-295, September 2003
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-01
A number of important legal theorists have recently argued for metaphysically realist approaches to legal determinacy grounded in particular semantic theories or theories of reference, in particular, views of meaning and reference based on the works of Putnam and Kripke. The basic position of these theorists is that questions of legal interpretation and legal determinacy should be approached through semantic meaning. However, the role of authority (in the form of lawmaker choice) in law in general, and democratic systems in particular, require that these realist solutions to the problem of legal determinacy be rejected, or at least significantly revised.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 17
Keywords: legal determinacy, semantic theories, Michael MooreAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 17, 2008 ; Last revised: January 22, 2008
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.390 seconds