Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1084716
 
 

References (37)



 


 



Punishment and Expiation: Overlapping Domains in Brahmanical Law


Timothy Lubin


Washington and Lee University; Washington and Lee University - School of Law


Indologica Taurinensia, Vol. 33, pp. 93-122, 2007

Abstract:     
It has long been debated whether it is possible to distinguish between secular and religious elements in 'Hindu law'. At present, the general view is that law cannot be separated from religion in the Indic context, not least because, according to the Shastras, Veda is the chief source of Dharma. Nevertheless, it is recognized that the Dharmashastra incorporates diverse elements: (a) explicitly stated norms of two types: (1) rules derived from priestly ritual codes, and (2) precepts drawn from the Arthashastra (political science) tradition; as well as (b) recognition of the authority of customs specific to region, caste, or profession. Although all these are subsumed within the Brahmanical system, we can discern different conceptions of the relative authority of brahmins and the ruler. This distinction of overlapping spheres of authority is reflected in the treatment of misconduct: the same act may entail punishment by the king as well as distant but automatic consequences due to the operation of karma, consequences that can be averted only by expiatory ritual performances. The ritual impurity of a sin also can have social consequences such as stigma or ostracism, which is likewise removed though expiation. Despite the interlinking of these spheres, their fundamental distinctness is acknowledged in the legal process prescribed in the codes as well as in the glimpses we have of actual legal practice in pre-modern India. Although the Dharmashastra overall represents a system of natural law based on the Brahmanical religious cosmology, it contains within it elements derived from a seemingly positive legal system based on the supreme authority of the king in settling disputes. Further, the distinction between brahmin and royal authority corresponds to a distinction, not between religion and law, but between two parallel and complementary legal subsystems, each with its own set of standards, procedures, and sanctions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: religious, law, priestly, punishment, penance, expiation, crime, sin, India, Brahmanical, authority, king, royal, secular, ancient, natural law, positive law

JEL Classification: K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 4, 2008 ; Last revised: March 3, 2008

Suggested Citation

Lubin, Timothy, Punishment and Expiation: Overlapping Domains in Brahmanical Law. Indologica Taurinensia, Vol. 33, pp. 93-122, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1084716

Contact Information

Timothy Lubin (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University ( email )
204 W Washington St
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
540-458-8146 (Phone)
540-458-8498 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://home.wlu.edu/~lubint/
Washington and Lee University - School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
540-458-8146 (Phone)
540-458-8498 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.wlu.edu/faculty/profiledetail.asp?id=297
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,915
Downloads: 285
Download Rank: 63,091
References:  37

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.329 seconds