|
||||
|
||||
Deadlines in Administrative Law
Jacob E. Gersen University of Chicago Law School Anne Joseph O'Connell University of California, Berkeley - School of Law University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2008 U of Chicago Law & Economics, Olin Working Paper No. 380 U of Chicago, Public Law Working Paper No. 196 Abstract: A cottage industry in administrative law studies the various mechanisms by which Congress, the President, and the courts exert control of administrative agencies. Restrictions on the appointment and removal of personnel, the specification of requisite procedures for agency decisionmaking, presidential prompt letters, ex ante review of proposed decisions by the Office of Management and Budget, legislative vetoes, and alterations in funding or jurisdiction all constitute potential mechanisms for the control of agency behavior. In this paper, we focus on a much more elemental mechanism of control that has surprisingly gone relatively unnoticed in the literature on administrative agencies: Congressional control of the timing of administrative action. The use of deadlines that require agency action to commence or complete by a specific date is extremely common in the modern administrative state, but even basic descriptive statistics about the frequency and nature of these mechanisms are lacking, much less a fully elaborated theory of regulatory deadlines. This paper offers the beginning of such a theory by providing a doctrinal, theoretical, and empirical analysis of deadlines in administrative law.
Keywords: deadlines, timing, regulation, administrative law Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 22, 2008 ; Last revised: November 04, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo3 in 0.125 seconds.