Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (532)



 


 



The Commandeerer in Chief


Jason Mazzone


University of Illinois College of Law


Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 83, 2007
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 64

Abstract:     
As Hurricane Katrina demonstrated, federalism can impede the government's ability to plan for and respond to emergencies. Many emergencies transcend federalist divisions of power and responsibility, rendering unclear which level of government should respond. In addition, while emergencies may require a coordinated response by local, state, and national government, getting different levels of government to work together in times of crises is difficult. Further, even when states and localities call for outside assistance, they tend to resist undue federal interference in their affairs; a national government that lacks experience working with local actors on the ground can find it difficult to implement relief programs. Given the widely recognized failures of the government's response to Katrina and the urgent need for reform, some federal officials have proposed that, in a future emergency, rather than try to work with state and local response personnel, the federal government should simply deploy the military to take over the relief effort. This Article presents an alternative solution: emergency commandeering. This solution would allow the federal government, when it responds to certain kinds of emergencies, to call into periods of mandatory federal service the emergency response personnel of the state in which the emergency occurs, and, if necessary, emergency response personnel from other states. These state employees - police, firefighters, emergency medical technicians, urban search and rescue teams, and public health specialists - would serve with compensation under the command of the President. Emergency commandeering allows the national government to mount an effective response, one that draws upon the skills and experiences of state and local personnel, without the hindrance of multiple command structures or other forms of state and local resistance. Emergency commandeering is authorized by the Constitution, consistent with federalism, and, compared to the alternative of sending the military into our streets, good for democracy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 89

Keywords: emergencies, federalism, Katrina, terrorism, natural disaster, commandeering, homeland security, FEMA, states, New Orleans

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 21, 2008 ; Last revised: January 28, 2008

Suggested Citation

Mazzone, Jason, The Commandeerer in Chief. Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 83, 2007; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 64. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1085669

Contact Information

Jason Mazzone (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 580
Downloads: 42
Footnotes:  532

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds