|
||||
|
||||
Civil Jurisdiction: The Boundaries between Federal and Tribal CourtsMelissa L. TatumUniversity of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 705, 1997 Abstract: A well-developed body of law, rooted in the U.S. Constitution, governs the relationship between federal and state courts. Tribal courts, however, are not subject to the U.S. Constitution, and that body of law does not help establish the relationship between federal and tribal courts. In the landmark cases of National Farmers Union and Iowa Mutual, the U.S. Supreme Court declared the scope of tribal jurisdiction was a federal question, but that litigants seeking to challenge the jurisdiction of tribal courts must first exhaust their tribal remedies. This article, published in the Arizona State Law Journal under my prior name (Koehn), explores the exhaustion requirement and its implementation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 64 Keywords: jurisdiction, Indian law, Native American law, tribal courts JEL Classification: K40 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 22, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.500 seconds