Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1086102
 


 



Civil Jurisdiction: The Boundaries between Federal and Tribal Courts


Melissa L. Tatum


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law


Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 705, 1997

Abstract:     
A well-developed body of law, rooted in the U.S. Constitution, governs the relationship between federal and state courts. Tribal courts, however, are not subject to the U.S. Constitution, and that body of law does not help establish the relationship between federal and tribal courts. In the landmark cases of National Farmers Union and Iowa Mutual, the U.S. Supreme Court declared the scope of tribal jurisdiction was a federal question, but that litigants seeking to challenge the jurisdiction of tribal courts must first exhaust their tribal remedies. This article, published in the Arizona State Law Journal under my prior name (Koehn), explores the exhaustion requirement and its implementation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: jurisdiction, Indian law, Native American law, tribal courts

JEL Classification: K40

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 22, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Tatum, Melissa L., Civil Jurisdiction: The Boundaries between Federal and Tribal Courts. Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 705, 1997. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1086102

Contact Information

Melissa Tatum (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 645
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 208,438

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.500 seconds