|
||||
|
||||
What Did "Bear Arms" Mean in the Second Amendment?Clayton E. CramerCollege of Western Idaho Joseph OlsonHamline University - School of Law Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2008 Abstract: Among the many heated controversies concerning the Second Amendment is the correct meaning of the phrase keep and bear arms. Those who argue that the original meaning of the Second Amendment was only to protect a collective right, either of the states to maintain militias, or perhaps of citizens to jointly form state-controlled militias, assert that bear arms refers exclusively or at least overwhelmingly, to the military carrying of weapons. Some have claimed that even keep arms was exclusively military in its meaning. While one might challenge the overly narrow focus on bear arms instead of the entire phrase keep and bear arms, those arguing for a collective right have thrown down the gauntlet by making this strong claim about just two words. This paper demonstrates that the Founding Generation did not understand bear arms as limited to military or collective militia duty but saw it as merely one way of expressing the concept of possession (as a modern speaker might say carry a gun).
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20 Keywords: bear arms, Second Amendment Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 31, 2008Suggested Citation |
|
||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.532 seconds