SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (20)

Beta

 


 



CHAMP: How the Tax Court Finessed a Bad Statute

Joel S. Newman
Wake Forest University - School of Law



Tax Notes, Vol. 116, No. 10, 2007
Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 1086692

Abstract:     
In Californians Helping to Alleviate Medical Problems, Inc. v. Commissioner (CHAMP), the Tax Court allowed business deductions for the expenses incurred in the sale of marijuana, despite the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 280E, which appears to disallow such deductions. This piece commends the Tax Court for finding a way around a bad statute. It then recommends that the statute should be repealed entirely.

Keywords: taxation, marijuana, deductions

JEL Classifications: H25

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: January 23, 2008 ; Last revised: January 25, 2008

Suggested Citation

Newman, Joel S., CHAMP: How the Tax Court Finessed a Bad Statute. Tax Notes, Vol. 116, No. 10, 2007; Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 1086692. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1086692


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Joel S. Newman (Contact Author)
Wake Forest University - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 255
Downloads: 34
Footnotes: 20

© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.141 seconds.