|
||||
|
||||
Why Don't People Insure Late Life Consumption: A Framing Explanation of the Under-Annuitization Puzzle
Jeffrey R. Brown University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Jeffrey R. Kling Brookings Institution; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Sendhil Mullainathan Harvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Marian Wrobel Harvard University - Institute for Quantitative Social Science January 2008 NBER Working Paper No. W13748 Abstract: Rational models of risk-averse consumers have difficulty explaining limited annuity demand. We posit that consumers evaluate annuity products using a narrow investment frame that focuses on risk and return, rather than a consumption frame that considers the consequences for lifelong consumption. Under an investment frame, annuities are quite unattractive, exhibiting high risk without high returns. Survey evidence supports this hypothesis: whereas 72 percent of respondents prefer a life annuity over a savings account when the choice is framed in terms of consumption, only 21 percent of respondents prefer it when the choice is framed in terms of investment features.
JEL Classifications: G11, H55, J14 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: January 24, 2008 ; Last revised: February 22, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2010 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was served by apollo1 in 0.172 seconds.