|
||||
|
||||
Sars and International Legal PreparednessJason SapsinJohns Hopkins University - Department of Health Policy and Management Lawrence O. GostinGeorgetown University - Law Center - O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law Jon S. VernickJohns Hopkins University - Bloomberg School of Public Health Scott BurrisTemple University - James E. Beasley School of Law Stephen TeretJohns Hopkins University - Bloomberg School of Public Health Temple Law Review, Vol. 77, p. 155, 2004 Abstract: SARS was a reminder of the continuing threat of epidemic disease in the world. This paper discuss examples of how regions faced with SARS turned to disease control strategies based on public health law, such as "personal control measures" like quarantine and isolation; weaknesses in the ability of nations' legal systems to frame balanced, coordinated and well-executed public health programs for rapid disease containment; and the responses of diverse populations to restrictive personal control measures. The paper uses the experiences of governmental entities of Singapore, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Canada, and the United States to illustrate important public health law and preparedness challenges for infectious disease control. While the experiences of these nations may not perfectly apply in other nations, they represent a spectrum of political and legal cultures. The paper concludes with recommendations encouraging enhanced legal preparations for public health emergencies.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20 Keywords: Public Health Law, International Law, WHO Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 28, 2008 ; Last revised: January 30, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.532 seconds