|
||||
|
||||
Evaluating Continuous Training Programs Using the Generalized Propensity ScoreJochen KluveHumboldt University of Berlin; RWI; IZA Hilmar SchneiderInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA); DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research Arne UhlendorffInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Zhong ZhaoInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA); Renmin University of China December 2007 Ruhr Economic Paper No. 35 Abstract: This paper assesses the dynamics of treatment effects arising from variation in the duration of training. We use German administrative data that have the extraordinary feature that the amount of treatment varies continuously from 10 days to 395 days (i.e. 13 months).This feature allows us to estimate a continuous dose-response function that relates each value of the dose, i.e. days of training, to the individual post-treatment employment probability (the response). The dose-response function is estimated after adjusting for covariate imbalance using the generalized propensity score, a recently developed method for covariate adjustment under continuous treatment regimes. Our data have the advantage that we can consider both the actual and planned training durations as treatment variables: If only actual durations are observed, treatment effect estimates may be biased because of endogenous exits. Our results indicate an increasing dose-response function for treatments of up to 100 days, which then flattens out. That is, longer training programs do not seem to add an additional treatment effect.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 49 Keywords: Training, program evaluation, continuous treatment, generalized propensity score JEL Classification: D13, Q41 working papers seriesDate posted: January 30, 2008Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.343 seconds