Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1088542
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (148)



 


 



Where are All the Left-Wing Textualists?


Paul Killebrew


affiliation not provided to SSRN


New York University Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 1895-1928, 2007

Abstract:     
What Professor William Eskridge once called the new textualism is not so new anymore. Statutory textualism has adherents on the Supreme Court, throughout the federal judiciary, and, increasingly, in academia as well. And almost all of them are politically conservative. Why is that true? This Note contends that it need not be. Taken at face value, textualism serves neither conservative nor liberal ends. However, those most closely identified with textualism - namely, Justice Antonin Scalia and Judge Frank Easterbrook - practice a form of textualism that creates institutional dynamics that tend to reconcile with a preference for limited government. Their textualism, which this Note dubs clarity-driven textualism, constrains the functioning of Congress, executive agencies, and judges in ways that make government hard to do: Statutes are hard to write, agencies have tightly circumscribed authority, and judges have few opportunities to exercise discretion. This Note argues that textualism alone will not necessarily produce these outcomes. By identifying how clarity-driven textualism departs from the bare requirements of textualism itself, this Note seeks to rescue textualism's powerful interpretive approach from its current political entanglements.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: textualism, textualist, statutory interpretation, Chevron, Scalia, Easterbrook, Eskridge, Waldron

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Killebrew, Paul, Where are All the Left-Wing Textualists?. New York University Law Review, Vol. 82, No. 6, pp. 1895-1928, 2007 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1088542

Contact Information

Paul Killebrew (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 759
Downloads: 116
Download Rank: 142,237
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  148

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds