SSRN Home Search and Download Papers Browse Abstract and Paper Submission Subscribe to Networks View Briefcase Top Papers Top Authors Top Institutions

 

Abstract

 
 

References (47)

Beta

 
 

Citations (2)

Beta

 


 


Download | Share | Email | Add to Briefcase | Buy Hard Copy

Going Private But Staying Public: Reexamining the Effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on Firms' Going-Private Decisions

Robert P. Bartlett III
University of Georgia Law School



UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-003
University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This article examines whether the cost of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) contributed to the rise in going-private transactions after its enactment. Prior studies of this issue generally suffer from a mistaken assumption that by going-private, a publicly-traded firm necessarily immunizes itself from SOX. In actuality, the need to finance a going-private transaction often requires firms to issue high-yield debt securities that subject the surviving firm to SEC-reporting obligations and, as a consequence, most of the substantive provisions of SOX. This paper thus explores a previously unexamined natural experiment: To the extent SOX contributed to the rise in going-private transactions, one should observe after 2002 a transition away from high-yield debt in the financing of going-private transactions towards other forms of "SOX-free" finance.

Using a unique dataset of going-private transactions, this paper examines the financing decisions of 468 going-private transactions occurring in the eight year period surrounding the enactment of SOX. Although SOX-free forms of subordinated debt-financing were widely available during this period, I find no significant change in the overall rate at which firms used high-yield debt-financing in structuring going-private transactions after SOX was enacted. Cross-sectional analysis, however, reveals that the use of high-yield financing marginally declined after 2002 for small- and medium-sized transactions, while significantly increasing for large-sized transactions. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the costs of SOX have disproportionately burdened small firms. They also strongly suggest that non-SOX factors were the primary impetus for the "name brand" buyouts commonly evoked as evidence that SOX has harmed the competitiveness of U.S. capital markets.

Keywords: Sarbanes-Oxley, Securities

JEL Classifications: G30, G32, G34, G38, K22

Accepted Paper Series

Date posted: February 04, 2008 ; Last revised: May 15, 2008

Suggested Citation

Bartlett, Robert P. , Going Private But Staying Public: Reexamining the Effect of Sarbanes-Oxley on Firms' Going-Private Decisions. UGA Legal Studies Research Paper No. 08-003; University of Chicago Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1088830


Export to: Export Citation What's this?

Contact Information

Robert P. Bartlett III (Contact Author)
University of Georgia Law School ( email )
Athens , GA 30602
United States
706-542-5433 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,359
Downloads: 425
Download Rank: 17,772
References: 47
Citations: 2
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use  Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo 2 in 0.109 seconds.