Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1088905
 
 

Footnotes (133)



 


 



Reason and Common Ground: A Response to the Creationists' 'Neutrality' Argument


Timothy Sandefur


Pacific Legal Foundation


Chapman Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2008

Abstract:     
Although it is a well-established scientific fact, evolution remains a controversial subject in the United States, and especially the issue of teaching evolution or creationism in public schools. An argument that appears to be increasingly popular among creationists is based on a postmodernist notion that science is simply one among many different but equal "ways of knowing," and that its ascendancy over other methods is due to conflicts between social power structures rather than any objective superiority. Several creationist writers have argued that science's exclusive reliance on natural causes (so called "methodological naturalism") is an a priori assumption, or an arbitrary preference, and therefore that both it and religion are equally valid epistemologies. In addition, they argue that the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment prohibit government from endorsing or granting "preferences" to science over supernaturalism.

This article is a response to these theories. In Part I, I argue that science is an objectively superior means of knowing, and that methodological naturalism is not an a priori assumption, but both an a posteriori preference and one that is necessary for any valid epistemology. I also reject the argument that naturalism or "humanism" are "religions" or that science requires a "leap of faith." In Part II, I address whether the First Amendment requires the government to remain "neutral" between supernatural and naturalistic worldviews. I conclude with some general observations on the conflict between science and supernaturalism.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 27

Keywords: evolution, creationism, education, stephen w. trask, methodological naturalism, science

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 1, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Sandefur, Timothy, Reason and Common Ground: A Response to the Creationists' 'Neutrality' Argument. Chapman Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1088905

Contact Information

Timothy Sandefur (Contact Author)
Pacific Legal Foundation ( email )
930 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 7,414
Downloads: 1,228
Download Rank: 7,960
Footnotes:  133

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.204 seconds