Empirical Research on Employment Arbitration: Clarity Amidst the Sound and Fury?

43 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2008

See all articles by Alexander J.S. Colvin

Alexander J.S. Colvin

Cornell University - School of Industrial and Labor Relations

Abstract

This article reviews the existing empirical research on employment arbitration and presents new findings based on analysis of data from recent American Arbitration Association employment arbitration case filings. Whereas past research often concluded based on more limited datasets that outcomes from employment arbitration were generally similar to those from litigation, results of the present study, which is based on a larger dataset focused on cases involving employer promulgated agreements, indicate that both employee win rates and damage awards in employment arbitration are significantly lower than in litigation. By contrast, results of the present study confirm previous research findings that time to hearing is generally shorter in employment arbitration than in litigation. As with past research, the present study finds evidence of a repeat player effect, though with some uncertainty as to the causal explanation for this effect. Self-representation of employees is found to be associated with significantly worse employee win rates and damage awards, particularly where the case involves by a repeat employer-arbitrator pairing. Lastly, the article reviews research indicating some positive impacts of employment arbitration on the adoption and operation of internal organizational dispute resolution procedures.

Keywords: employment arbitration, dispute resolution

JEL Classification: J52, K31, K41, M12

Suggested Citation

Colvin, Alexander J.S., Empirical Research on Employment Arbitration: Clarity Amidst the Sound and Fury?. Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1090335

Alexander J.S. Colvin (Contact Author)

Cornell University - School of Industrial and Labor Relations ( email )

Ithaca, NY 14853-3901
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
730
Abstract Views
4,618
Rank
64,363
PlumX Metrics