Review of Talbott's 'Which Rights Should Be Universal?'
David A. Reidy
University of Tennessee - Department of Philosophy
Human Rights Review, Winter 2008
This review essay sets out the key features of the human rights position developed by Bill Talbott in his Which Rights Should be Universal?. It then argues that Talbott's position is not so much an alternative to Rawls's position as it is a plausible and attractive answer to a question other than the one to which Rawls's own position on human rights is an answer.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 11
Keywords: Talbott, Rawls, human rights, universal, international relations, global justice
Date posted: February 6, 2008
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.500 seconds