Footnotes (53)



Suresh and Canada's Obligations Regarding Torture

Evan Fox-Decent

McGill University - Faculty of Law

National Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 12, pp. 425-447, 2001

While recognizing that the right not to be subjected to torture is non-derogable, in Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration,) the Federal Court of Appeal has found that it is not contrary to Canada's international legal obligations nor the Charter of Rights and Freedoms to deport a person to a country where there are substantial grounds to believe that he or she would face a serious risk of torture. The following comment considers the Court's approach to international human rights law in that case. The author analyses the Federal Court of Appeal's judgment in light of the Supreme Court of Canada's recent holding in Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship & Immigration) that the legislature is presumed to respect the values and principles enshrined in international law, both customary and conventional.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 24

Keywords: torture, suresh, international law, human rights, implementation, incorporation, reception, refugee, deportation, refoulement

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 12, 2008 ; Last revised: November 22, 2015

Suggested Citation

Fox-Decent, Evan, Suresh and Canada's Obligations Regarding Torture. National Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 12, pp. 425-447, 2001. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091148

Contact Information

Evan Fox-Decent (Contact Author)
McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )
3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,338
Downloads: 181
Download Rank: 112,927
Footnotes:  53

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds