Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091524
 


 



Preaching, Fundraising, and the Constitution: On Proselytizing and the First Amendment


Mark Strasser


Capital University - Law School


Denver University Law Review, Vol. 85, pp. 405-441, 2007

Abstract:     
The Court's proselytizing jurisprudence might seem relatively straightforward, as reflected in the Court's Village of Stratton opinion. Yet, the jurisprudence is far from clear when one factors into the analysis the Court's analyses in the ISKCON cases. This article examines the Court's proselytizing jurisprudence, suggesting that members of the Court seem to be of at least two minds both with respect to whether religious speech should simply be treated as any other form of protected speech and with respect to whether religious fundraising should be afforded robust constitutional protection. The article concludes that the ambivalence on these questions helps to explain what is currently a confused and confusing jurisprudence.

Keywords: proselytize, fundraising, ISKCON, religious speech

JEL Classification: J71, K10

Accepted Paper Series


Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 10, 2008  

Suggested Citation

Strasser, Mark, Preaching, Fundraising, and the Constitution: On Proselytizing and the First Amendment. Denver University Law Review, Vol. 85, pp. 405-441, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1091524

Contact Information

Mark Strasser (Contact Author)
Capital University - Law School ( email )
303 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH 43215-3200
United States
614-236-6686 (Phone)
614-236-6956 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 173

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.406 seconds